Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Brompton Lifeco Split Corp T.LCS

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.LCS.PR.A

The Funds investment objectives are to provide holders of Preferred shares with fixed, cumulative, preferential quarterly cash distributions in the amount of 0.15625 per share and to return the original issue price of 10.00 per Preferred share to Preferred shareholders at maturity; and to provide holders of Class A shares with regular monthly cash distributions, targeted to be 0.075 per share, and the opportunity for growth in Net Asset Value per share. To achieve these objectives, the Fund invests in a common share portfolio of the following Canadian life insurance companies on an equally weighted basis at the time of investment and any subsequent rebalancing.


TSX:LCS - Post by User

Post by mousermanon Jan 14, 2025 9:06am
61 Views
Post# 36402910

Insurance risk not fairly distributed

Insurance risk not fairly distributed

Globe says Intact, rivals hear need for public insurer

Intact Financial Corp (C:IFC)
Shares Issued 178,363,968
Last Close 1/13/2025 $252.16
Tuesday January 14 2025 - In the News

Also IGM Financial Inc (C:IGM) In the News
Also Manulife Financial Corp (C:MFC) In the News
Also Sun Life Financial Inc (C:SLF) In the News
Also Toronto-Dominion Bank (C:TD) In the News

The Globe and Mail reports in its Tuesday, Jan. 14, edition that with natural disasters becoming more frequent high-risk property owners are really incentivized to insure. The Globe's guest columnist Claude Lavoie writes that this limits the insurance company's ability to pool the risk and forces them to charge high premiums that are too expensive for many homeowners. Given this insurance gap, governments -- and thus taxpayers -- often end up covering the losses with the province offering compensation to households and passing on a big part of the bill to Ottawa through the Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements program. It is unfair for taxpayers, especially those far from water, to cover losses for wealthy homeowners who knew the flood risks when buying prime waterfront properties. If the government pays, these homeowners have no reason to buy insurance or mitigate risks. Additionally, leaving devastated households without support is politically unappealing. Mandating multiperil insurance for homeowners pools risks across all households, making premiums more affordable. Since all Canadians face natural disaster risks, this approach is fairer than a voluntary single-risk insurance plan.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts