curiousStoxxman you posted "Another week and we'll see about management's bold pronouncement of a bedrock source."
Your implication is that the assays will determine if management is correct about the bedrock mineralization being the source of the surface anomalies.
Others have already pointed out that the source for the anomalous surface soil values may not be ore grade or ore quantities. Management, who have been on site and viewed the types of mineralization are confident the soil anomalies have a bedrock source. My reading of the NR indicates that management does not expect ore grades from the assays of the first 3 holes (I will be pleasantly surprised by ore grade values)yet management stands by their statement that they have shown the bedrock mineralization to be the source.
You went to great pains in an apparent effort to teach the rest of us the difference between ore and mineralization. Now you imply that the mineralization must be ore if management's statement is true.
Do you have a problem comprehending these concepts and phenomenon or as Brumell alludes, are you only interested in stirring up the dung pot? You already know what my opinion is about your level of comprehension and your motives.