Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by stockman6on Apr 23, 2002 11:46am
165 Views
Post# 5037412

RE: Short report/ Part 3

RE: Short report/ Part 3Here's another post from Teevee on shorting ISA. I especially like the following words of wisdom from the esteemed Bay Street drunk: "Nobody makes big (short) bets against a purported "block buster" drug, unless they know something that the street hasn't tuned into yet." That's right Teevee, "NOBODY". P.S. What rhymes with "hypocrate". ---------------------------------------------------------------- The last news release indicates short positions are increasing-that is what the title of my post referred to. Evidently, I just didn't make it clear enough. The recent pattern of trading suggests to me that the size of the short postion is getting even larger as retail buys come in on the upticks. I thought that the article I posted was particularily timely, given the nature of the posts lately. I do hope that cooler heads prevail on this thread, rather than the continued attacks by those who are head over heals in love with ISA. I doubt the increase in short positions is based only upon technical trading patterns and stock price history. Nobody makes big (short) bets against a purported "block buster" drug, unless they know something that the street hasn't tuned into yet. What that might be, and as important, how critical that information is, is the $64,000.00 question. Could it be only a matter of timing (ie. no phase II results until the 4th quarter 2002),or something critical to the success of ISAtx247?
Bullboard Posts