SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust T.SRU.UN

RE: Solid Analysis of the Play and the Geology

[madmagoo]

the problem with this board is the selective reading and replies, to busy bashing each other over the head. sophocles please tell vic to read my analysis re MSK . hard facts and numbers yet no one replies, go figure. obviously not interested in an intelligent conversation. MSK promoted the heck out of 5 great but narrow intercepts, thats all that they had and no inferred resource estimate (i think there are so many news releases i may have missed it). grades got progressively worse, go figure. Like i said before they were releasing new every time someone crapped in the bush. This is why there is no support. it was also during the time palladium when nuts causing a good spec run in PMG juniors as well PFN went to 4 bucks now at $0.75. though PFN is still a good opportunity and deserves better support and MSK remains a dog, clearly hyped. I think SRU has a few more 5 good holes, talking about the 60 million tonnes Ni, Cu and PMG's ignoring high grade narrow intercept. From what i understand geophysical work improves to the west, haven't drilled yet. so please show me your direct comparison VIC. Explain to me why SRU and MSK are the same, hard facts please and not because you say so, maybe good for some but not for me. can you stop playing around with these guy long enough and back up what you say?