Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF T.XST

Alternate Symbol(s):  ISTIF

The investment objective of the Fund is to provide long term capital growth by replicating, to the extent possible, the performance of the S&P TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index the Index, net of expenses. To achieve its investment objective the Fund uses an indexing strategy. Under this strategy, the Fund seeks to replicate the performance of the Index, net of expenses, by employing, directly or indirectly, through investment in one or more iShares ETFs and/or through the use of derivatives, a replicating strategy or sampling strategy. A replicating strategy is an investment strategy intended to replicate the performance of the Index by investing, directly or indirectly, primarily in a portfolio of index securities in substantially the same proportions as they are represented in the Index.


TSX:XST - Post by User

Post by workedforXSTon Jun 28, 2002 12:14am
349 Views
Post# 5247391

The system

The systemI actually worked for the company for a while and can tell you two things for sure. 1)The company had and should still have a working product and software. The new management of May 2001, decided to cut all ties with existing customers and abandon the old systems in favor of concentrating on a new advanced project that was being built for Veritas. When Veritas pulled out, I was told they were 90- 95% complete and the system was succesfully tested in live trails. Being there was no other active customer, no revenue other than Veritas and no sales or other support staff, the company had to right-size its staff (to 0). Veritas has the systems and XS doesn't. That's why the company didn't have anything to go forward with and no revenue stream to revive the old stuff or to take them anywhere. (IMO not a very smart move) This new hardware and software was firmly based on the old hardware and software. The first old system was succesfully installed in the Bahamas in 1995 or 96. They also had systems installed in several other countries and a few in Canada and the US, but couldn't seem to get any market penetration because of the high costs involved. 2) The company asked Veritas to let them release the news to the market for the duration of the project (8 months or so) but Veritas insisted that they had a major competitor that was looking at building similar systems and that the news would warn the competion that Veritas was in this project. The equipment may have given Veritas a competitive advantage, I don't know. I am not defending anyone here because frankly how stupid do you have be to let this happen. It sure impacted the employees and their families not to mention you guys the shareholders. I don't know anything about this lawyer or what his game is and you can sit and speculate all you want to, but the facts is still the facts.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>