Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Iplayco Corp Ltd IPPQF

Iplayco Corp Ltd designs, manufactures, and installs indoor and outdoor play structures for children. It operates in two business segments: Manufacturing of play structures for children from its facilities in Langley, British Columbia, Canada, and Subic Bay, Philippines; and Operating a family entertainment center in Langley, British Columbia, Canada. It offers play products, such as indoor play, air trek, ballistics play, toddler play, theming, outdoor play, outdoor installs, indoor installs, p


GREY:IPPQF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by FFHWatcheron May 28, 2003 11:52am
75 Views
Post# 6123079

RE: FFH Watcher please provide insight

RE: FFH Watcher please provide insightI know of no 'rush for the gates' at IPC. I have heard some rumours but the reality is, most of IPC's AUA are tied up in the Senior Associate Share Plan (SASP). The reps books of business are owned by IPC, not the rep. IPC purchased their books in return for shares. In return IPC gets an extra 10% in commission on the book of business and owns it. If the rep leaves, the clients stay with IPC. Secondly, In this market environment, clients do not want to talk to their reps, let alone have the confidence in the rep to change mutual fund dealerships, sign a dealer change letter and then receive a letter from IPC stating that they can't change their account over because it is owned by IPC. Also the rep would likely receive a Cease and Desist letter if they try to move their book of business out of IPC (ie. Investors Group). Most of the large producing IPC reps will likely stay for the above reason and because I don't think there is a better alternative right now. The only reason that I can see why a rep would leave IPC and risk losing their entire book of business is if the rep believes IPC is insolvent and that an acquirer will not be found. In that event, IPC would not have the financial or personnel resources to chase down all the reps that are leaving, regardless of who owns the book. I do not believe the above scenario to be the case. If ING was not a significant financial backer of IPC, my opinion may change.
Bullboard Posts