RE: We have an ONC insider interesting observation...
lets see now...
we have many people observing that BT was rather tight-lipped with his AGM presentation. having listened to it myself, if he fails at making onc successful, i think he has a future in producing 28.8K internet recordings to help people fall asleep.
yet we also have the "revelation" that an onc "insider" has been posting on this board for some time, apparently stating with authority things that the president of the company won't even commment publicly on, presumably for confidentiality reasons.
that Calgary Herald article about market regulators looking into unusal trading in onc is starting to make more sense.
maybe the authorization for the issuance of an additional 11M shares was done to ensure they could raise enough money to continue for another 12 months (remember this was proposed when onc was still at $1.50) rather than issuing to a potential partner?
based on all the heightened speculation and hype that has turned into expectation here about an "imminent" partnership, if onc doesn't come through "soon" as some put it, we'll be back in the $2's, if not lower, in no time.
something to think about.