RE: bilosellhi must be from Missouriproboscis
i have a healthy dose of skepticsim, others who have a much more optimistic bent, who take offense to someone who points out that their fantasies of $100 share price might be a bit premature, might see me as a basher, so be it. i'm not one to mind ignores from the ignorant.
i think my posting history has shown that i will acknowledge when i've erred - and i've been willing to put my money and onc shares behind my posts - something that i haven't seen from too many others here.
regarding promotion, if there are still survivors from the first phase I trial still alive, or for that matter ph II glio patients, who shouldn't be based on their prognosis prior to treatment with reolysin, that would be newsworthy and something that should be communicated officially and regularly updated by onc.
i know in the past there have been reasons given that they can't disclose results because of patient confidentiality, etc., but i don't see how providing periodic updates on the status of patients as a group violates an individual's privacy or misrepresents the facts, if in fact, those patients are surviving beyond expected timeframes. its almost like these guys are trying to keep this a big secret for some unknown reason.
i understand people might not like having such inconsistencies pointed out, but to try to discredit the messenger - well, they only discredit themselves in the attempt.
carry on
