Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

St Andrew Goldfields Ord STADF



OTCPK:STADF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by flyonon Oct 15, 2003 7:00pm
126 Views
Post# 6525464

RE: Odin...re VicSmith

RE: Odin...re VicSmithodin, responding to your email.. i'm neutral to positive when it comes to Vic. He's a 'free' resource for opinions, and his knowledge of geology and 'bay street/howe street' isn't too bad either. He catches quite a lot of flack for his views, good, bad or ugly. I understand he likes africa plays, but this year any junior, doesn't matter where, will run if the geology "looks" like a winner. As for Vic, use him as a benchmark for your own analysis of the gold junior sector, his forum is designed for this, whether he knows it or not. I got the ball rolling on Vic vs Heritage because I know St.Andrew management aren't idiots. They did their DD regarding the SIB claims. The Heritage stake is an exploration gamble to go with the conservative Timmins and Nixon Fork properties. Heritage is also a platform to prove geoinformatics in an area of difficult historical exploration. The last few posts on this forum and Vic's own comments, make my point.
Bullboard Posts