share saleI have been a long time shareholder and while I am still optomistic on onc's prospects, one of my concerns for a long time has been that brad thompson only owned 9000 shares of onc. I realize he has a lot of options however we all know the old saying of putting your money where your mouth is.
I find it extremely disconcerting that thompson and cox would sell all of their shares. The fact that so little money (and shares) were involved makes their conduct and the message they were sending all the more disconcerting. Surely they must have known what kind of impact their actions would have had.
What possible rational explanation could there be.