RE: Bilo, misinterpretation re: Prostate NRBilo, you are jumping to conclusions that are not supportable by the facts given by ONC.
interesting that if there were more than 6 patients enrolled why there is absolutely nothing contained in the "final" nr on the subject to suggest it, and onc has failed to have reuters correct their version which clearly leaves the impression there are only 6.
" The study involved six patients who received a single injection of Reolysin and were monitored for about three weeks."
https://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040227/health_oncolytics_1.html
could it possibly be that for unexplained reasons they decided to end the prostate trials a year after the interim results without anything of substance to add to the interim report, and so they decided they better have some additional news (UK trial) to release with it, otherwise their mis-handling of this trial would be way too transparent?
you have no facts to support there were more than 6 - because onc didn't give you any - these guys are wordsmiths when it comes to releases - remember they made the ph 1 glio halt issued days before Xmas sound positive with all the stuff about how safe it was without then explaining why if it was safe they had to stop the ph I safety trials?
of course that halt only lasted 6 months - that is immaterial considering the length of that trial so i guess we'll just ignore that, huh?