RE: the way I see it....The fact that he apparently has never contacted the company indicates that he has no intention of finding out the truth. I therefore believe that it is more than just a case of ignorance, but rather a deliberate effort to damage the reputation of the company.
i haven't read this guys' posts, and based on your assumed accurate regurgitation of his position, i certainly would not support his views, but i do fine it interesting for someone whose views are regarded by the "masses" here as well-informed and objective to come out and form their own "belief" on something that would be very difficult if not impossible to know first hand, unless the company betrayed a trust and confided in you all of their conversations with every single person. (maybe they have, which would reduce both your & the company's credibility.)
whats more, whenever i have contacted the company, i am usually looking for "facts", not the "truth" - maybe you "believe" that the company only dispenses "truth", but that sounds a bit "cultish" based on my experience.
perhaps the more and harder you believe something, the greater the chances of "it" coming "true"?
now that
is an interesting perspective - nothing scientific whatsoever about it, but certainly interesting.