Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Search Minerals Inc V.SMY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHCMF

Search Minerals Inc. is an integrated mineral exploration and development company, which is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of rare earths elements (REE) mineral properties in Labrador. It focuses on developing critical rare earths elements (CREE), Zirconium and Hafnium resources within the Port Hope Simpson-St. Lewis CREE District of South East Labrador. It controls two deposits (Foxtrot and Deep Fox), two drill ready prospects (Fox Meadow and Silver Fox) and other REE prospects, including Fox Valley, Foxy Lady and Awesome Fox, along a 64 km long belt forming a REE District in Labrador. It also controls additional CREE assets in the Red Wine District of central Labrador. These include the drill ready Two Tom Lake CREE-Be-Nb deposit, the Mann #1 CREE-Nb-Be prospect and Merlot CREE Prospect. The Two Tom Property includes mineral licenses 027358M and 016522M in Labrador, Canada. The Red Wine property is located 80 km north-east of Churchill Falls, Labrador.


TSXV:SMY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by ticktalkeron Mar 29, 2004 5:36pm
348 Views
Post# 7283623

More on Wal-mart

More on Wal-martWal-Mart's RFID plans hit trouble March 29 2004 by Ron Coates US retail giant Wal-Mart's controversial RFID tracking tag rollout across its supply chain has been hit by delays and logistical problems, and the company's UK subsidiary Asda has confirmed it now has no plans to take the technology forward either. The news is a setback for the RFID industry, which is pushing the technology as a barcode replacement to help track goods from the warehouse to the checkout, but is also predictable, according to one UK observer. Wal-Mart's diktat last summer to its top 100 suppliers to put RFID tags on their shipments by the end of this month had little chance of success, according to Meta enterprise programme director Enrico Camerinelli. The company has made no formal announcement but it would appear to agree. The retailer is concentrating on its drug suppliers with a deadline shifted to June or later. No announcements have been made on the rest of its retail suppliers, although trials are due to begin this summer. "Wal-Mart saw the benefits, but gave its suppliers no guidance and no support. And those with some muscle, some negotiating power, did not want to be guinea pigs for the whole RFID enterprise," said Camerinelli. He also claimed that Wal-Mart had not properly appreciated the effect on its own distributions system. For instance, it did not seem to realise that it would have to have two lines of readers; one for bar codes and one for RFID – and that this would cut the benefits of installing RFID. Camerinelli said: "On RFID there is curiosity and there is appreciation of the benefits – but there is very little money spent. To do it, you have to do what Tesco is doing here and Metro in Germany – work through it and give your suppliers support and guidance. And you have to appreciate the real impact of RFID is on business process and logistics." Asda last year volunteered for a government test of the technology run under the eCentre banner. A spokesman said: "We tried it on CDs in a few stores to track them from our suppliers to the stores. It was good but we have absolutely no plans to take it forward." One of the problems that Asda found was that if CDs were stacked spine upward the correct number of 20 would be registered – but if stacked flat as they are in stores, the 20 would register as only one copy.
Bullboard Posts