RE: 43-101's???Well I don't know much. Why else would I be involved in CD?lol. Only our B.O.D. would know for sure. Perhaps the BB member who received the original response from KMD on the 27 April may wish to write her back and ask if there were any changes/amendments required to the 43-101's and have they and when were the final versions submitted for approval? (Assuming they have been re-submitted).
If I would have to make an educated guess, I would say there would likely be a 43-101 for: 1. The Nevada properties (this 100% deal with Sovereign Gold still has not been approved by the Exchange and the gold bull market has years to run so diversify with more than one country); 2. Suwar (As there was a very good and detailed report done a few years ago by Vince Roberts if I remember correctly and the price of Nickle will continue to be above average IMO); 3. Al Masna (mainly because of the past work done to date and the positive results of the E.M. survey in 2002 and will need drilling to test the responses); and possibly 4. Al Hariqah (Because of the past work but as the property has many inhabitants nearby, it may make more sense to leave this one alone and seek out other possibilities elsewhere.
Who knows when we will see the light of day? PP announced in December 2003 and we are now in May! Maybe there was a curve ball or two thrown at the management from the Exchange and slowed up the process.