Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by kcjoneson May 14, 2004 3:30pm
110 Views
Post# 7488482

RE: Looks to me ...

RE: Looks to me ..."Am I the only one on this board that thinks we need more than Fluffy NR's to get the share price moving" No! you're not and I don't remember MOA throwing money at anyone to get the word out. Allen was on a couple of free shows with an interview, but that's about it. The PR would have been great except it's going to cost MOA too much! That's why no one is buying. We've suddenly become a very minor player. EET who didn't own anything ends up owning 3 times as much for NOT doing what they said they would do. When was the last time you got paid 3 times as much for not doing your job?? I hope Allen thinks long and hard before agreeing to this BS. This BS deal needs to be voted on by the shareholders...now I see why the AGM was delayed...can you image how the shareholders will react to this nonsense. KC
Bullboard Posts