Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Mountain Lake Resources Inc
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by kcjoneson May 14, 2004 7:30pm
88 Views
Post# 7489416

RE: Looks to me ...

RE: Looks to me ..." I am sure they have been advised by legal counsel on the proper procedures for this latest deal." I'm sure they have too, SAR, that however doesn't make it right. I'm sure the big whigs at Enron were advised by legal council as well. This deal stinks for MOA shareholders. We would be much better off by making a separate deal with Trans Hex for the 25%, and getting the he11 out of Africa, before EET sells us out completely. What can Allen tell me that hasn't been said here? KC
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities