RE: bilo : you're not making objective commentsone2dumb - you really have no clue or are purposely attempting to distort what was presented.
here is what you posted (as referenced in the link to your original post)
Patients alive at the time of writing or 709 days past intial interview = November 29, 2001 + 709 days = November 08, 2003.
to which i responded, that patient # 2 who was alive for at least 709 days after the interview, was likely interviewed shortly after the trial began in jun 2000 as the 2nd patient enrolled, not when the last patient was enrolled on nov 29, 2001.
so your logic is flawed, but i doubt your blindness will allow to see that fact. then you claim that #2 is still alive today with no corroboration (other than the word of BT which has been shown to also be flawed) and you want to tell me i'm not being objective???