TSXV:FCO.H - Post by User
Comment by
idleSpeculatoron Apr 19, 2005 7:55pm
155 Views
Post# 8928657
RE: RE DGK
RE: RE DGK"What gets me is that it is obvious to anyone with an ounce of brains that Rio has a negative agenda toward this company and for anyone who ones stocks or hopes to make money on stocks should IMHO attack these eco terrorists as if they were islamofacsists because both groups are on the same page."
Don
Just read what you wrote above. I actually don't know the proper name for some of the prejudices you exhibit above. Personally someone playing devils advocate on a board can be very helpful. If they raise the doubts, and those who know the answers post responses, everyone else ends up better informed and educated.
If the person raising doubts refuses to engage in take on board are bring arguiments to counter info in the response, they lose argument and credability by default.
If however you feel the need to respond with ludicrous labels, assumptions about peoples political, ecological, racial, sexual bents you do nothing more than expose yourself as ignorant. We resort to sauch things uysually when we are unable to put up a reasoned argument.
I read your post some months back accusing rio of being aligned with islamic fund-a-mental-ism / terrorists and what you thought should be done with "these people people". I shook my head in dispair at the the ignorance abounding in parts of NA, and the near Macarthurystic rabidness. If somene doesn't agree with you, give them a label and riducule and exclude it, try and whip people up into a frenzy against this group and talk about what should eb done with them. Wasn't that just what Hitler did in the 30's, and you call Rio a Facist.
Nopne of this gets us any closer to understanding any more tabout FCO.
I understand many people disagree with what RIO says, (not everyone though).
I get that Paul is much more technical and plugged in to the industry and can give more considered and qualative information.
And see several people resorting to name calling and self rightousness and making total fools of themselves. I have politely tried to point this out to them, in order that have more d}credability and we get more on topic posts that this board was once so good at.
Is that unrerasonable?
Idle