TSXV:ATR.P - Post by User
Comment by
thebadger1on May 10, 2005 12:32pm
50 Views
Post# 9015045
RE: ATR Comments
RE: ATR CommentsBy new to stockhouse you mean cal23, I don't agree. Funny how, an e-trade sale corresponds to implied negative comments about ATR the next day. I believe cal23 has been banned and this is his multiple user name. I encourage people to report this so stockhouse can track this down. Notice how rycro just started his username yesterday and has one post......lol.
To answer your questions:
1)Based on the age of this company, their earnings have experienced significant growth and are fulfilling their ambitions to acquire a third site. The most dilution I would predict is about 3 to 5% based on previous issues and a combination of some debt financing.
2) Anterra is alike any junior competing with bigger players. There are barriers to entry but with numerous engineers with 20+ years experienced, I wouldn't be too worried about their ability to strategically position themselves....they haven't had problems yet.
3) Overall value higher, reserve life index resulted in a nominal change. They also have geological surveys underway. Any speculation at this point is just that.
4) Suffield has only been in operation with a 75% interest since November. Thus, with only one month actually reported at year end, I think it is fair to say that one should wait to see what results over the next few months. Only an idiot would make useage commments for a site with low history of data.
5) The taxes thing is actually a good sign. It means they are profitable. Further, they likely have non-capital loss carry-forwards that can be applied in 2005 from their initial start-up year and these carry-forwards are eligible for seven years. Thus, I wouldn't expect tax to be very high at all.
6) The $200,000 was not just at Scots Lake and there is belief from the production side this can be expanded.
7) Insiders have not sold a single share yet.....NEXT QUESTION!