Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by eternaloneon May 12, 2005 4:57pm
198 Views
Post# 9027336

Bonaparte property

Bonaparte propertyFrom NAG's financials from SEDAR May 2, 2005: b. Bonaparte Property On August 12, 2003 the Company signed an option agreement entitling the Company to acquire a 70% interest (subject to a 2% NSR) in two mineral claims located in the Kamloops Mining Division of British Columbia. On December 3, 2004, the vendor agreed to accept the Company’s termination of the agreement and willingness to permit the Company to negotiate a new agreement with the original vendor. Accordingly, all costs related to the August 12, 2003 option agreement have been written-off to operations. As at December 31, 2004, and the audit report date, a new formal agreement had not been signed as both parties were still negotiating its terms. Subsequent to the termination of the above agreement, the Company acquired by staking an additional nine mineral claims located adjacent to the original mineral claims described above.
Bullboard Posts