Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Idx ETF T.CLG

The investment objective of the Fund is to replicate, to the extent possible, the performance of the FTSE Canada 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index the Index, net of expenses. The Fund uses an indexing strategy to achieve its investment objective. Under this strategy, the Fund seeks to replicate the performance of the Index, net of expenses, by employing, directly or indirectly, through investment in one or more exchange-traded funds managed by BlackRock Canada or an affiliate and or through the use of derivatives, a replicating strategy or sampling strategy. A replicating strategy is an investment strategy intended to replicate the performance of the Index by investing, directly or indirectly, primarily in a portfolio of index securities in substantially the same proportions as they are represented in the Index.


TSX:CLG - Post by User

Post by PGMBOYon Jun 23, 2005 12:45pm
115 Views
Post# 9199988

CENTRAL BANKS/FIAT MONEY/ GOLD??

CENTRAL BANKS/FIAT MONEY/ GOLD??"What we see at present is a battle between the central banks and the collapse of the financial system fought on two fronts. On one front, the central banks preside over the creation of additional liquidity for the financial system in order to hold back the tide of debt defaults that would otherwise occur. On the other, they incite investment banks and other willing parties to bet against a rise in the prices of gold, oil, base metals, soft commodities or anything else that might be deemed an indicator of inherent value. Their objective is to deprive the independent observer of any reliable benchmark against which to measure the eroding value, not only of the US dollar, but of all fiat currencies. Equally, their actions seek to deny the investor the opportunity to hedge against the fragility of the financial system by switching into a freely traded market for non-financial assets. It is important to recognize that the central banks have found the battle on the second front much easier to fight than the first. Last November, I estimated the size of the gross stock of global debt instruments at $90 trillion for mid-2000. How much capital would it take to control the combined gold, oil and commodity markets? Probably, no more than $200bn, using derivatives. Moreover, it is not necessary for the central banks to fight the battle themselves, although central bank gold sales and gold leasing have certainly contributed to the cause. Most of the world’s large investment banks have over-traded their capital (bases) so flagrantly that if the central banks were to lose the fight on the first front, then their stock would be worthless. Because their fate is intertwined with that of the central banks, investment banks are willing participants in the battle against rising gold, oil and commodity prices. Central banks, and particularly the US Federal Reserve, are deploying their heavy artillery in the battle against a systemic collapse. This has been their primary concern for at least seven years. Their immediate objectives are to prevent the private sector bond market from closing its doors to new or refinancing borrowers and to forestall a technical break in the Dow Jones Industrials. Keeping the bond markets open is absolutely vital at a time when corporate profitability is on the ropes. Keeping the equity index on an even keel is essential to protect the wealth of the household sector and to maintain the expectation of future gains. For as long as these objectives can be achieved, the value of the US dollar can also be stabilized in relation to other currencies, despite the extraordinary imbalances in external trade." Peter Warburton’s entire April 2001 article, archived at David Tice’s Prudent Bear site, is hyperlinked here. As I mentioned before, this revision to the CRB index is just another attempt by ‘the powers that be’ to forestall a rush to hard assets from paper assets. They want everyone to go down with the fiat currency ship. Now it appears that the boys are trying to extend their influence over all commodities, rather than just the two they are actively managing right now…gold and silver; and two others that they are trying to manage…oil and natural gas. One of many persons that can see this commodity freight train getting up to top speed pretty soon is the always erudite Doug Casey. In one of his latest offerings he had this to say… "But you may be asking: Casey, what makes you so sure that this actually is a major secular bull market for the resource stocks? There are lots of reasons. But in brief, we’re coming off the longest and deepest secular commodity bear market since the depression of the ‘30s. Commodity prices are still far closer to historic lows than historic highs, at least in “constant” dollars, which is what counts. The world economy is evolving away from the debt-burdened U.S. and towards China, India, and numerous smaller countries; their growth will be volatile, but it’s for real, and they’ll consume unbelievable amounts of raw materials in the coming years. There’s been very little mineral exploration for a full generation, the industry has come nowhere near replacing reserves, and a historic supply crunch in many commodities is in the making. Governments will always act stupidly, but the long-term trend is inevitably towards freer markets, higher standards of living—and higher resource consumption." Doug’s entire article, which is well worth the read, is hyperlinked here. It is just such a commodity boom Casey and many others are forecasting, that this newly revised CRB is meant to blunt. This attempt will fail. The index may become so discredited as a ‘benchmark’ that it might be abandoned entirely, and another index compiled to take its place…or run concurrently with it….such as the HUI has done with the XAU. They may manage the index, but they can’t manage every commodity on the planet that’s in it…or the ones that aren’t. Doug Casey is right… "Governments will always act stupidly." That would also apply to central banks and investment banks as well. Based on this upcoming revision on June 20th, it would be my opinion that these banks (and their ilk) will keep a lid on all critical commodity prices until such time as this revised version of the CRB is up and running. Time will tell whether my musings in this essay have any basis in fact. I’ll find out soon enough. But in the meantime, as we all wait in breathless anticipation for this new "30-Day CRB Wonder" to come shambling forth, I’m going to get out my bucket of holy water and read the current CRB its last rites. It has served us well, and may it rest in peace. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact Info For general information about GATA, including information on contributing financially, go here: www.GATA.org
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>