TSXV:FCO.H - Post by User
Post by
pcnisbeton Jul 18, 2005 11:57am
340 Views
Post# 9290602
Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm
HummmmmmmmmmmmmmThings that make you go Hummmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If your case against FCO is so strong, why would your leading anti-FCO guy need to make obviously false statements regarding my past employment with Formation?
Formation did not 'fire' me, because you can not fire a director. I resigned from the board in February 1998 and just as the Newsrelease said at the time, I did so to work on other projects.
So if you lie about something as basic as why I left FCO, how can your credability on other subjects be very high?
And how absolutely childish can you be to do little word games with a last name? Its Nisbet, not some stupid varient to try to run someone down like an eight year old.
FCO will end up with road access order by the courts. They will address site concerns with EPA internal to their permits and not have to be involved in the Consent Decree. The issue of site concern is water loading with copper and has nothing to do with arsenic and never did.
So Rio and his 'me to' chorus can keep plugging away with lies, but do any of you in that line up seriously think that you are doing anything other than a major smear job?