Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North Shore Uranium Ltd NSU


Primary Symbol: V.NSU

North Shore Uranium Ltd. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the exploration for uranium deposits at the eastern margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. The Company conducts its exploration programs on its two properties, the Falcon Property and the West Bear Property. The Falcon Property is located approximately 35-kilometer (km) east of the former Key Lake Mine and the active Key Lake uranium mill which processes ore from the McCarthur River Mine. The West Bear property consists of five mineral claims totaling 4,511 hectares located at the eastern edge of the Athabasca Basin which hosts two producing uranium mines.


TSXV:NSU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by scissors14on Aug 31, 2005 8:30am
139 Views
Post# 9487009

RE: Asmara 'uncomfortable' with US aid group

RE: Asmara 'uncomfortable' with US aid groupEritea wants American help despite asking USAID to go 31 Aug 2005 11:09:52 GMT Source: Reuters By Ed Harris ASMARA, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Eritrea voiced hope on Wednesday that its request for the U.S. government's overseas development agency to leave the poor Red Sea state would not bring the end of aid from its biggest food donor. In July, Eritrea asked the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to stop working in the drought-stricken country, one of the most food aid dependent nations in the world, saying it was uncomfortable with the agency's activities. "It is our hope that the departure of USAID would not result in the stoppage of emergency assistance and development assistance to Eritrea," Woldai Futur, Eritrea's Minister of National Development, told Reuters. Diplomats in Asmara speculate the request may be linked to the central role the U.S. agency has assumed within the non-governmental organisation (NGO) community, or that it upset Eritrea by making a June aid announcement unilaterally. A senior U.S. delegation, including officials from USAID, arrived in Eritrea at the weekend for talks with the government and other aid groups, though diplomats say decisions on U.S. aid will be made in Washington. "We very much see our position on USAID as separate from our desire to maintain and strengthen our cooperation with the United States," Futur added, listing the Eritrea-Ethiopia border stalemate, terrorism, and trade as areas of mutual interest. He did not specifically explain Eritrea's discomfort with USAID's work, saying it was a bilateral matter. MONEY WELL SPENT? But he questioned the efficiency of the $75 million spent by the United States on aid and development programmes in the fiscal year 2004, most of which went on food. "The U.S. buys its food from the U.S. market, so it is a subsidy to U.S. farmers, a very high price. It transports the food in U.S. vessels which costs you four times as much," he said. "If it (the $75 million) were used to buy food from the international market, it would have gone a long way." The United States has provided Eritrea with a total of 774,679 metric tonnes of food over the last five years. In June, the U.S. government announced it would provide extra food aid to cover more than 100 percent of Eritrea's cereal food aid needs this year. Futur said food aid was a short-term solution for Eritrea. "Food aid is important to save lives, but food aid is not the way we can reduce poverty," he said. "Probably Eritrea could do better with $40m (than the United States with $75 million)," he added. Eritrea's rebel movement-turned-government has a history of sensitive relations with the aid community due to its desire for self-reliance and resentment at the international community's perceived favouritism for neighbouring Ethiopia. Ties with the aid community have been particularly strained in recent months by the impounding of vehicles and a new proclamation to regulate the activities of NGOs.
Bullboard Posts