RE: Shares SoldYou are still in denial - looking for an 'explanation' as to how the EM surveys could have been so out of whack on the second hole...
This was spelled out in plain English in the May 16th news release:
"...thin sulphide intersection is comprised primarily of uneconomic pyrrhotite at a drillhole location intended to test the centre of a sub-basin that also hosts the Sullivan Deposit. As pyrrhotite is highly conductive, this thin sulphide interval could account for the large-scale target conductor observed during down-hole UTEM4 geophysics completed in late 2004 and geophysical work carried out by others in 1996."
The only 'mystery' to me is why this is still at a dime.