RE: some interesting readingbetween us, the people on Stockhouse who really know how to judge stock, (eg perhaps, the people who buy rgz ehehhe) we are roughly the type of people in a position to actually CAPITALISE this time around, on the type of opportunities described by your article there.
Any of us who run into each other at Stockhouse, we might disagree on the values of various stocks, but we're all of a milleau. - the group of guys trying to makea-the-money from mostly-mining stocks. None of us might be top-level sharks, but we can at least make it to well-fed fish stage... and look out, if the resource boom keeps strong - with the next 5 years a continuation of the last 5 - then there's a billion or two little fi$h coming to swim in our swamp. (It needs peak public participation to get these 1000-bagger results that micro-cap miners do sometimes deliver. Someone's got to pay too much at the end, ideally. But these new dollars will be attracted by the returns and the bull market mentality. Ordinary money will choose commodities.)
We all have reasons to ensure we hang in here - keep connected with the commodity boom at all costs - rather than try to be a hero and bet it all on the one life-changing play.
That being said, I'm insanely over-invested in rgz, just because I think they're 5-10x better than the usual ~$100m ore companies, at least when you look at two or three killer parametres, i.e. how large the deposit, how rich the deposit, how good the prospects for expansion of the deposit. And that was just Titan. The diamond thing now is outrageous by x10 for a whole nother set of deposit parametres.
Victory looks very good so far (early daze yeti;) it looks good on the four parametres I focus on with diamond deposits,
*Tonnage (Successful holes kmm away from each other. Promises size.)
*Carats per ton (freaky so far. eg Our headline news 8cts whatever in less than a ton of dirt. Abundance of micros is highly-suggestive of macros.)
*average size of stones (eg give us a few big ones,) Another parameter where rgz's early diamond results are 10 out of 10. Read em & weep. Buy 10 out of 10 whenever you see an exploration company score it.
*Quality of stones - white & clear,= two thumbs up so far. I don't know a lot about it, but if the early lucky finds are relatively high-qual, then I'm encouraged that the overall quality of diamonds on the property will at least be ok, and well, maybe be great.