proof of efficacy?So the trial begins at last… I thought this might bump the stock 10 cents when I first read the news release. Why the spike?
Well, when you think about it, the fact they are enrolling this trial could be taken as proof of efficacy at Marsden. Brad has said they wouldn’t want to market the product as a five-day treatment if one day works fine. The Marsden trial was set up to maximize the dosage (volume and days) to overcome the immune response seen in other trials. They would have been stupid to start with the one-day trial.
It would also be unwise to run the one-day trial (cost) unless they were already seeing positive results from Marsden. Why back up the dosage unless the five-days was showing efficacy?
On a different note, is it possible for a true long to take money off the table? Seriously, if you put all the clues together over the past six years, then this appears to be the best and safest cancer treatment to arrive in a very long time… It seems a shame to part with even a few shares.