Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF T.CGR

Alternate Symbol(s):  IGREF

The investment objective of the Fund is to replicate, to the extent possible, the performance of the Cohen & Steers Global Realty Majors Index the Index, net of expenses. To achieve its investment objective the Fund uses an indexing strategy. Under this strategy, the Fund seeks to replicate the performance of the Index, net of expenses, by employing, directly or indirectly, through investment in one or more iShares ETFs and/or through the use of derivatives, a replicating strategy or sampling strategy. A replicating strategy is an investment strategy intended to replicate the performance of the Index by investing, directly or indirectly, primarily in a portfolio of index securities in substantially the same proportions as they are represented in the Index.


TSX:CGR - Post by User

Post by Dennis64on Oct 20, 2005 6:10pm
97 Views
Post# 9742891

A little help please?

A little help please?Listed below is a copy of the last news I had found for CGR. In the news it says it is re evaluting to determine viablity of the depost. Does this mean they are considering entering into pre feasability or is this actually pre feasabillity? I am also reading not to expect much more news until this report is finished? I am not well versed in gold stocks so please help me with easy to understand english?? Thanks in advance, Dennis Coral Gold to re-evaluate Robertson resource 2005-10-13 17:42 ET - News Release Mr. David Wolfin reports Coral Gold Resources Ltd. has plans to update the current indicated mineral resources at the company's 100-per-cent-owned Robertson property located in Lander county, Nevada. The re-evaluation will include results from the company's 2004 and 2005 drilling programs. Development of a new block model and resource calculation will be conducted by Barnes Engineering Services of Golden, Colo. The current indicated mineral resource will be re-evaluated using an appropriate geostatistical approach necessary to support an economic study to determine viability of the deposits. Those portions of the resource, which meet the criteria as measured, will be reclassified as defined under National Instrument 43-101. Results from the current re-evaluation are also expected to identify areas within or adjacent to the current mineral resources where additional drilling is necessary before future reclassification can be made. The new block model and resource calculation is expected to be completed by December, 2005. Beginning in 2004, Coral completed three reverse circulation drilling programs at Robertson, which totalled 32 holes having a total footage of 24,120 feet. Of the total footage drilled, 22 holes totalling 15,315 feet were directed at defining and extending the 39A zone and six holes totalling 5,205 were drilled in the Gold Pan zone. In addition, 2,400 feet in two holes were completed in the distal target area and 1,200 feet in two holes were drilled in the Porphyry zone. In 1996, after completing over 176,000 feet of combined reverse circulation and core drilling, Amax Gold Inc. defined a low-grade drill-indicated resource estimated to contain 36.5 million short tons of mineralized material averaging 0.028 ounce per ton gold, using a 0.01-ounce-per-ton-gold cut-off grade. The historical mineral resources cited above are presented for background only and do not represent defined mineral resources on the property. Additionally, the classification of these historical mineral resources do not conform to National Instrument 43-101. In 2001, citing low gold prices, Coral revised the 1996 Amax Gold resource estimate using higher cut-off grades. The resulting indicated mineral resource was estimated to contain 10.97 million short tons of mineralized material averaging 0.053 ounce gold per ton. In 2004, this indicated mineral resources was reported in a National Instrument 43-101-compliant technical report, "Geological Report on the Robertson Property, Lander County, Nevada USA. (McCusker, 2004)," which is available on SEDAR in Stockwatch. R.T. McCusker, PGeol, a qualified person pursuant to National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and verified the data disclosed in this news release.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>