Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

St Andrew Goldfields Ord STADF



OTCPK:STADF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Monedas1on Nov 24, 2005 4:13am
250 Views
Post# 9902233

RE: News - Recommendations

RE: News - RecommendationsBenson and some other who post here and on SSR and CCH know much more than I but I will make a few comments because "somebody is sure to comment" and I may be able to decide what I want to do. SAS and CYP are different animals from structure and objectives from my point of view although the prices are comparable. SAS is both near term production [Stock Gold Complex and from Nixon Fork] and exploration [Eskay and Timmons]on a longer hold. CYP is a short term well positioned [Red Lake] longer shot that could explode if SSR hits and one of CYP's five winter holes works out. I own both but hold much more SAS. I also like, have in some cases have bought small positions but am still evaluating to buy or buy more: NSM, PNL, MUG, VAN and XRC. All are quite different plays. I also have and like GSM but can't figure out why the good drilling results are not driving the stockprice more but NSM, PNL and XRC holders are also complaining about this same problem. Good Luck
Bullboard Posts