Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

North American Gem Inc
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by Pauly79on Nov 25, 2005 11:17am
156 Views
Post# 9914216

RE: Why?

RE: Why?While Ranger and NAG are partners on this one property, NAG has a ton of land in So.Ab. Of the other juniors there (Firestone, Marum, etc) NAG has the biggest stake of land, I believe. If the area does contain significant uranium deposits, NAG is well positioned. Check out the map at https://www.northamericangem.com/nagalbertamap.pdf
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities