Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sienna Resources Inc V.SIE

Alternate Symbol(s):  SNNAF

Sienna Resources Inc. is focused on exploring for and developing high-grade battery metals deposits in mining jurisdictions. The Company’s projects include Elko Lithium Project, Clayton Valley Blue Clay Lithium Project, Clayton Valley Deep Basin Lithium Brine Project, Clayton Valley Silver Peak South Lithium Project, Dragon Uranium Project, Uranium Town Project, Marathon North Platinum-Palladium Property, Stonesthrow Gold Project, and others. Elko Lithium Project consists of 1,840 contiguous acres in Nevada. Clayton Valley Blue Clay Lithium Project consists of 150 contiguous claims totaling 3,100 acres prospective for lithium rights in Nevada. Clayton Valley Silver Peak South Lithium Project consists of one contiguous block totaling 1,812 acres. It owns the 10,845 contiguous acres of Dragon Uranium Project and the 10,357 acres of Uranium Town Project. It also owns the 55,440-acre Atomic Uranium Project. It also owns Case Lake West Cesium and Spodumene Pegmatite Project in Ontario.


TSXV:SIE - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Pauly79on Dec 10, 2005 7:56pm
104 Views
Post# 9997948

RE: NR may become fewer

RE: NR may become fewerI know that the legislation applies to reporting issuers with a substantial connection to Ontario. So, I believe that the company does not have to be incorporated in Ontario, but that the fact that many investors are from Ontario is enough to make it liable under the legislation. Also, I'm not sure if claims would be limited to Ontario investors. Those outside the province may be able to join in. The worry among corporations, directors, officers, and corporate lawyers, is that the legislation will open up the floodgates for investor class-action suits against companies. The main mechanism which will prevent this, however, is the requirement that potential plaintiffs essentially seek permission from the court to bring a legal action. I'm not sure how the BC legislation differs.
Bullboard Posts