Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum American Bonanza Gold Corp ABGFF

GREY:ABGFF - Post Discussion

American Bonanza Gold Corp > Goldman Sachs
View:
Post by Z06 on Sep 18, 2012 11:02am

Goldman Sachs

Their killing us.
Comment by herry on Sep 18, 2012 11:05am
so is the management there a joke just like the shareprice, just add one more to the pile Z06.herry
Comment by sadone on Sep 18, 2012 12:12pm
They are a start-up mine that is currently not hitting the grade they had in their business plan, this quarter.
Comment by Leafs007 on Sep 18, 2012 4:22pm
I like your picture. So the company went from 0.27 oz/t to 0.12 oz/t, that is still A LOT better than many producing companies.  4 g/t is nothing to sneeze at.  I know of a producing company trading in the 2.50 range whose avage gradeis less than 1 g/t.  Not to mention the very low cash cost.  I know of only a handful of companyies who have lower cash cost.
Comment by Combo9 on Sep 19, 2012 3:02am
What troubled me was that their NI 43-101 estimated cash costs were $415/oz based on average grades of 10.3 g/t (0.33 oz/t) in the measured and indicated categories. This latest update suggested the average grades for the 3 months ending June were 3.7g/t (0.12 oz/t).  If they need to extract and process 2.8x more ore to obtain one ounce, then cash costs will generally be 2.8x higher also at ...more  
Comment by mylar1 on Sep 19, 2012 9:46am
What troubles me is that you are still posting here two days after you supposedly sold if you ever held any shares in the first place!! The other thing that troubles me is what part of "average" don't you understand? Are you suggesting that the time frame for "average" is 3 months? Another troubling aspect here is that you only started posting on BZA on Sept 10!!!!!!   ...more  
Comment by Combo9 on Sep 19, 2012 10:26am
mylar, I still see it as a potentially good investment but not at these prices.  As I explained, the difference between 0.27 oz/t (cash costs of $415/oz) and 0.12 oz/t (cash costs of $1155/oz) is $740 less profit per oz.  That's almost $2m less profit for those 3 months than expected, which translated into a increase in equity issuance needed by the same amount, which means more ...more  
Comment by hassy on Sep 19, 2012 11:07am
what is the right price for you? 20% lower than whatever it is trading? that's called gambling not investing. we are not even at commercial production yet thus the need to finance to at least get to that part. Until then go play with herry and try to figure out what the right price is in your toy box.
Comment by Combo9 on Sep 19, 2012 11:13am
Bring up the 5 year chart, take a guess.
Comment by hassy on Sep 19, 2012 11:22am
I dont need to guess. I am fully aware of the 5 yr price. do you invest based on 5 year chart? wow. good luck. hope you know the difference between an exploration company and producer.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities