Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum American Creek Resources Ltd ACKRF


Primary Symbol: V.AMK

American Creek Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based junior mineral exploration company, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally for precious metal deposits. The Company’s projects include Treaty Creek and Austruck-Bonanza. The Treaty Creek Project covers approximately 114 square km in the Skeena Mining District of northern British Columbia and is... see more

TSXV:AMK - Post Discussion

American Creek Resources Ltd > Tokens outstanding???
View:
Post by Larry60 on Oct 28, 2024 1:58pm

Tokens outstanding???

Per the since deleted NGTG white paper, the CUnninghsam group owns 900 million tokens!!!!  They are trying to issue 100 million tokens from treasury for $60 million...............implying mkt cap for token of $1 BILLION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  $15K in tokens have traded in total oer the past 3+ days!!!!!!!!!

Holy rumper flumper.......................................
Comment by johny52 on Oct 28, 2024 2:44pm
Larry all of your panic posting reeks of desperation that it isn't working out for your current short position.  I hope you have to cover at .43 cents
Comment by Larry60 on Oct 28, 2024 2:52pm
johnny, im not short.....and im not desperate!   Good news for those that are short, downside is basically couging up the bid price!!!!!! Im amazed by the sheeple..............they dont care that Cunninghsam has been at this almost a year......................yet no $$$$$ to fund the AMK deal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The rumpin and flumpin is impressive thoughs......... Confident in my massive ...more  
Comment by johny52 on Oct 28, 2024 3:43pm
If this deal goes through it will be more than your 200% yearly portfolio increase.  I am ok with the risks involved as per my own independant investigations. Everyone here is aware of the risks so you should stop with the repeditive posting. 
Comment by karlschranz on Oct 28, 2024 3:44pm
Lassie60 , you are the stockhouse star-investor. Without any doubt
Comment by Mustang80 on Oct 28, 2024 4:34pm
Apparently I miss a lot by blocking. Ehh I made my decisions & don't think Sprott is a pump & dump crook. He'll do well with his money in his next venture beyond AMK, as I hope to do as well! 
Comment by Larry60 on Oct 28, 2024 4:49pm
mustang, no one said Eric is a crook............ he also is just a shareholder.  he wants his 43 cents a share which works out to $30 million for his position give or take................he is NOT the one making the bid!!!!!!!!!!!! problem is, Cunninghsams got no $$$$$!!!!  $3.5k of the token traded in past 24 hours!!!!!!!!!!!  Eric cant be happy about that, can he?????  His ...more  
Comment by GoldDigger60 on Oct 28, 2024 5:02pm
Hey Mustang, It must be driving our panic poster crazy not knowing how many tokens are actually sold on the exchanges and in the pre-sale. Also not knowing if ES is a major token holder or not. Cunninghams must of missed the memo that they had to keep the panic poster in the loop with all inside knowledge and financials. Dont let the snakes get in your head, Eyes on the prize!
Comment by Larry60 on Oct 28, 2024 5:12pm
GD, I think its hillarious that we get to see the amount of volume in NGTG!!!  $3.2k for the past 24 hours!!!!  Wowzer.................thats almost like $210 million...........but different............by a factor of 65,500 times...............thats a lot of days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Whats even funnier is that CUnninghsam group gave themeselves 900 milliion tokens!!!!!!!!!!!!!  900 ...more  
Comment by GoldDigger60 on Oct 28, 2024 5:40pm
Whats funnier is that you have been wrong 100% of the time so far. For months you have spreading fear and manipulation messages. You even put the implication that assays were stolen one point or that the company couldnt afford to pay for them.. You have been wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME, absolutley nobody here believes anything you say. Most of your messages mirror your other username on the other ...more  
Comment by Larry60 on Oct 28, 2024 5:49pm
Ive been consistent: 1)  Cunningham does not have money, 2)  Cunningham will not raise $210 million, 3) Cunningham group of compnaneis speaks for itslef, 4)  Cunningham will rumper flump this unti an adult steps into the room...................... i stand by those views..................... Deadlines have been pushed out multiple times already.................that will likely ...more  
Comment by cskhurasu on Oct 28, 2024 5:58pm
Actually, GoldDigger60, Larry60 may be tediously repetitive but he is almost always rigorously factual. His arguments are rational. We will see if he is wrong in the end but I suspect not. This AMK deal has never made any sense to me.
Comment by GoldDigger60 on Oct 28, 2024 7:40pm
Are you still pro SEA ? I think you, the panic poster and the rest of the peanut gallery all work for the same SEA crusaders and you are all terrified of the Amigos suceeding and crippling Seabridge.   Four years ago you posted on your first post  I am a longstanding shareholder of Seabridge. I see there are people here on this site saying Tudor has an advantage over Seabridge ...more  
Comment by cskhurasu on Oct 28, 2024 7:44pm
TUD has no idea if it needs tunnels because TUD hasn't figured out where to put its tailings or its mill. The tunnels at KSM solved a problem required to get a permit. You don't design a mine on the basis of what you want to do but on what you are allowed to do. TUD has not begun to face these issues yet.
Comment by LonghandStrong on Oct 28, 2024 8:21pm
If....  1. TC becomes a mine, and 2. The mine is block cave, as described previously, then 3. TC will need two tunnels. Twin tunnels are a function of block caving.   One tunnel is access and haulage, the other is ore / water.   Unless of course there is some sort of teleportation method I haven't heard about, but I suppose if that was the case they'd just ...more  
Comment by GoldDigger60 on Oct 28, 2024 8:57pm
Truth is you have no idea of how TC will be developed. I think I'll wait for the PEA next year to hear what TC will be and need. But in the mean time I  know there won't be a sea tunnel going through for a long time, if ever. I dumped all the sea I had and moved it to the Amigos. 
Comment by LonghandStrong on Oct 29, 2024 1:13am
What do either of those points have to do with a contention that block cave = two tunnels?   The point made by the poster was that TC didnt require tunnels.  My counterpoint was that it's been discussed that block cave was a potentially good method to extract TC deep stock works, requiring in turn, two tunnels for TC.    1. Of course there is no formal mine plan, we ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities