Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Advanced Explorations Inc. ADEXF

"Advanced Explorations Inc is a development stage company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of properties within the resource sector."

GREY:ADEXF - Post Discussion

Advanced Explorations Inc. > NI 43-101 Inferred Resource Estimate for Tuktu Iro
View:
Post by going-on on Jan 13, 2012 7:51am

NI 43-101 Inferred Resource Estimate for Tuktu Iro

Advanced Explorations Files NI 43-101 Inferred Resource Estimate for Tuktu Iron Project

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Jan. 13, 2012) - Advanced Explorations Inc. (the "Company" or "AEI") (TSX VENTURE:AXI)(FRANKFURT:AE6) is pleased to announce the SEDAR filing of the National Instrument (NI) 43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate for its Tuktu Iron Project located in Nunavut, Canada, approximately 60km north of the company's flagship Roche Bay Iron Project and 70 km west of the hamlet of Hall Beach (www.sedar.com).

As press released on November 28, 2011 an Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for the Tuktu Project consists of 465 million tonnes grading 31.1% total iron (Fe) and 35.13% total magnetic at a 20% iron cut-off, as outlined in Table 1. The Tuktu 1 resource estimate represents but a small portion of the entire Tuktu project and demonstrated a high consistency of the average grade (31.1% Fe) regardless of the cut-off grade used.

John Gingerich, President and CEO, commented:

    "The resource estimate lays a solid foundation to undertake an economic assessment as to the conventional exploitation of the Tuktu 1 deposit. With additional drilling along strike and extending the depth, AEI believes it can substantially increase the size of this resource. While this is a very important next step, the Company will also look to assess the potential of defining a resource associated with the high grade direct-ship-ore type samples (over 62% Fe) taken from the Tuktu 2 area located 10 km southeast of the Tuktu 1 deposit".
 
 
Table 1 - The 2011 Tuktu Magnetite Deposit Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate.*
Lower
Cut-Off

% Fe
(Total)
Tonnes
(000,000)
%
Fe
(Total)
%
Magnetic **
%
S
(Total)
%
P***
g/cc
SG
15 467.212 31.02 35.10 0.30 0.04 3.358
18 466.416 31.04 35.12 0.30 0.04 3.359
20 465.336 31.07 35.13 0.30 0.04 3.359
22 463.557 31.11 35.16 0.30 0.04 3.359
24 459.917 31.17 35.24 0.30 0.04 3.360
25 457.086 31.21 35.28 0.30 0.04 3.360
26 451.713 31.28 35.33 0.29 0.04 3.361
28 431.492 31.47 35.51 0.29 0.04 3.363
30 361.950 31.90 35.94 0.27 0.04 3.367
Notes:
* Inferred Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves. Inferred Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability, and may never be converted into Reserves.
** "% Magnetics" represents Satmagan test data which is a physical test of the percentage of magnetic minerals in a given sample. This value can be affected by magnetic minerals other than magnetite the most likely being pyrrhotite, an iron sulphide mineral. However, APEX accepts that the Satmagan data is essentially equivalent to (but not actually) a measure of % magnetite based upon observations made during core logging and the relatively low total sulfur assays indicating that the potential influence of minerals such as pyrrhotite is negligible. Davis Tube test work to validate Satmagan data is currently underway at Activation Laboratories.
*** Converted to %P from %P2O5.

The Inferred Mineral Resource estimate was completed by APEX Geoscience Ltd. ("APEX") in conformance with the CIM Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

A sensitivity analysis of the grade and tonnage relationships, based upon total iron cut-off values, demonstrates remarkable consistency at a number of grade cut-offs. This result was not unexpected as the model was well constrained to the Tuktu iron formation, which was observed to be consistent in magnetite content visually and in grade both along and between drill hole intercepts. This was further supported by detailed ground geophysical surveys and geological mapping.

As yet, no metallurgical testwork has been conducted on drill core material from the Tuktu deposit and thus APEX has selected for reporting purposes a resource calculated using the same 20% total iron cut-off grade that was selected for the resource calculation at the Company's Roche Bay C-Zone deposit (see AEI Press Release April 6, 2011) available at www.sedar.com.

The resource estimate reported in this press release was prepared by Steve Nicholls, MAIG under the direct supervision of Andrew Turner, P. Geol., and Michael Dufresne, M.Sc., P.Geol., all with APEX, who have reviewed and verified the contents of this release. Andrew Turner, P.Geol., and Michael Dufresne, P.Geol., are "Qualified Persons" as defined by National Instrument 43-101.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

John Gingerich, President & CEO

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BY the way:

Have a look at the german wallstreet forum you can read lots of infos more. 

How ist the news about Tuktu assessed? User Tepin has a lot of good infos and conclusion.
 
Please use the Google Translator
Comment by zedman4 on Jan 13, 2012 9:49am
What really stands out for me with this nr are the following; a) the 62% fe sample collected 10 km se of the Tuk #1 deposit...... b) the entrenchment of Micheal Durfrene & company into the affairs of aei. With all the claims staked in his name in the Mellville Peninsula; I would not be surprised to hear more of him in the near future. He is the type of " hands on type" that I would ...more  
Comment by Shlinker_ on Jan 13, 2012 9:50am
No new news. Its completely useless in this market. We need over a billion tonnes proven, not inferred. Not sure if it'll ever make it there. Especially if the company has no cash. Another PP coming in spring. See now ive become sceptical myself. Cheers.
Comment by MurrayMac on Jan 13, 2012 1:44pm
Hello again zedman....   "The rest of the nr is soiled with the word " Inferred"   I'm not too sure why you have difficulty with a "inferred" resource and others are looking for 1 billion tons initially??   I assume everyone is aware that this was the very first drill program on this property......ever! A half a billion tons of "inferred" iron ...more  
Comment by zedman4 on Jan 13, 2012 2:00pm
Then why use the word "inferred' at all? I stopped reading after the 4th one. It scares the heck out of me.... oh I  know it's part of the course when writting up nr's. By the way 2 of your posts with maps and dia- grams are not getting through. It may be my computer; Will check later on with the computer at work. Thanks for sharing. p,s what's the deal with the 49.9 ...more  
Comment by MurrayMac on Jan 13, 2012 2:25pm
"p,s what's the deal with the 49.9% ownership of the Tuktu, this is a surprise to me since I was never aware of it."   That's my point, to you, Behr, and all other old timers on this board! :) This is basic AXI fundamentals that everyone should have knowledge of.....if you are investing in AXI, or considering investing in AXI.   Not only does Roche Bay fall under the ...more  
Comment by rpdeluca on Jan 13, 2012 2:37pm
Well I'm glad Zedman that someone had to clarify for you that what I was saying was the truth. I've stated many times that I'm not on here to pump the stock...I"m a long term holder and believe in the project.  I'm also a frustrated shareholder as things have taken far longer than I would have hoped....but this is what you are dealing with when it comes to junior and in ...more  
Comment by MurrayMac on Jan 13, 2012 3:08pm
I concur with rpdeluca zedman.....I have been reading all the posts, and I really don't understand what your issue is/was with rpdeluca. For he himself, has been trying to correct fallacy here a lot longer than I have.   You have to admit zedman, you have stated many fundamentals/issues incorrectly! As have I, but only with resepect to increased timelines, due to the complexity of a ...more  
Comment by zedman4 on Jan 13, 2012 3:17pm
I'm sold. Looks like this a good entry point to get back in. By the way; just looked out my window and noticed a woman in a short tight skirt; above the knees; walking by; it's -49 with the wind chill. No whimps allowed in the arctic; have a nice day. You too Deluca. let's make some faloose!!!!!
Comment by rpdeluca on Jan 13, 2012 3:42pm
-49...WOW..maybe time to invite her in Zedman for some nice warm cocoa (lol)...cheers
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities