Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Alexandria Minerals Corp ALXDF

Alexandria Minerals Corp is a Canadian based gold exploration and development company. Its project consists of Orenada, Akasaba, Sleepy, Manitoba and Ontario properties together with the Other Quebec properties. It is mainly focused on exploring the cadillac break property which is located in Val-d'Or, Quebec. The cadillac break property consists of approximately 21 contiguous projects of over... see more

GREY:ALXDF - Post Discussion

Alexandria Minerals Corp > Cost of Corebox
View:
Post by LRGreturns4me on Feb 16, 2018 7:08pm

Cost of Corebox

The cost of Corebox is around $5k per year if I am not mistaken. I wonder if we could convince AZX to load the data using their IR budget?
Comment by goldhunter11 on Feb 17, 2018 11:55am
LRG, $5k/yr is pretty cheap for a tool that can be used for drill planning and playing around with the ER in-house. The cost for IR and Corp Development are hefty according the last Financial Statement, link below. for 6 months in 2017 (page 2). IR and Corp Development fees are $291.8k and 108.5k respectively. Also, professional fees of 100k was payable to EO (Baker Creek compnay) on top of his ...more  
Comment by LRGreturns4me on Feb 18, 2018 8:59am
GH, Thank you for the reply, I was being a little bit of a SA about the $5k since the cost is so low. I get the thinking and setup for PRB and would prefer anyone over ELD. I just know the mill at Sigma-Lamaque will have capacity and the ore is compatible with Lamaque, so from a project development and compatibility lens, that would make sense. I am still wondering what was the catalyst that ...more  
Comment by easycoder on Feb 18, 2018 9:34am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by NextPhase on Feb 18, 2018 10:51am
I am still wondering what was the catalyst that pushed EO to issue the NR a week ago? He had to know it was the end for him, so just what was it that got him reacting with emotion over thought?[/quote] LRG, After looking at AZX’s past drilling programs more closely, I have a new theory on what led EO to issue the NR. Look at the following headlines. Jan 30, 2015: Alexandria Minerals ...more  
Comment by goldhunter11 on Feb 18, 2018 12:56pm
NP, I understand that you are trying to give EO a fair hearing. Fine by me...But I would like to follow up with one of you comments: "If AZX did conduct a financing, then I agree with the BoD view that we should wait for the resource estimate to encourage a higher valuation before tapping the financial markets." EO did conduct the financing (without getting the approval from the BoD ...more  
Comment by NextPhase on Feb 18, 2018 1:14pm
I understand that you are trying to give EO a fair hearing.    GH, I'm mostly giving EO a fair hearing, because I lack details, while also trying to understand his perspective. I would like to add another benefit to merging with PRB. Consolidating overhead between AZX and PRB into one company reduces average costs while combining resources, operations, and valuations. Thus ...more  
Comment by goldhunter11 on Feb 18, 2018 1:26pm
NP, If you are in the Toronto area you may want to give Henry or Gundy a call (or leave your number they can call you). It would be good for them to hear directly from an investor. You could send an e-mail first and follow up with a call. Give them ideas! IR is now actually forwarding e-mail to the addressee. GH ---------------
Comment by goldhunter11 on Feb 18, 2018 12:20pm
LRG, It's pretty obvious that EO has not been happy with a situation where he cannot take the role of the founder, as he has for many years. From the latest Corp Presentation (Nov 2017... you should access it before it's replaced by a more up to date by the new mangement) EO gave some hint about the projection of his image: - Slide 13 shows management, including himself, insiders and " ...more  
Comment by LRGreturns4me on Feb 18, 2018 7:24pm
GH, All great points, thanks. I too question the 6% number and never got an answer. Thanks LRG
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities