Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Argex Titanium Inc. ARGEF

"Argex Titanium Inc is a Canadian company producing high-grade titanium dioxide (TiO2) pigment. The company has developed a chloride-based technology, which is environmentally sustainable. The white pigment produced by Argex is to be used in high-quality paints, plastics, specialty, and other applications."

GREY:ARGEF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by TomKCam on Jan 21, 2020 11:33am

Lawsuit

Going into a lawsuit, you need a strategy. A winning outcome. At this time, what it would be? Even if someone was capable of proving that the company did not act fairly, what would be the outcome for the shareholders? You want to fight the technology ownership over the debenture holders and the stalking horse bidder? And PWC trustee work under a Canadian law, approved by a judge multiple times. Now the directors discharged by the process. Good luck with that!

There is no winning case for the shareholders right now. A lawsuit would be a money pit. My guess is that the winners would be at this time, the lawyers. So be careful.

The only winning scenario I can think of, and it is probably stretched, is after a plant is built with the technology. The technology is sold at a high price or is providing revenue. The lawyers would accept to take a percentage of the possible money prize for the shareholders. And the technology commercialisation success would give enough indications that something was not handled rightfully by the board of directors.

I lost a lot of money in this investment. I took too much risk. With the informations that was provided by the company, I think it was an OK bet. But still, to much allocation in my portfolio to Argex. I will not put more money into this. I am a better investor now, by a very expensive lesson. I do not think it was necessary to learn it this way. But, I will try to use this for better gains elsewhere. I might not sound that much touched, but I am profoundly. I wish good luck to all.

I guess it will be my last post onto this board. Except maybe to follow up on this one.

Tom
Comment by BlueChip9 on Jan 21, 2020 12:07pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by TomKCam on Jan 21, 2020 1:07pm
BlueChip9, Sad to read some of my old posts. Putting money in a lawsuit, one should think of this as an investment. You tell me that it might be just 1000$. But how would you know that it would be enough. Nobody knows this. Don’t you think? A lawsuit can be very long with all sort of imprevisible outcomes. You have to pay the lawyers until the case is done. At least, you should know what can you ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities