Post by
BWJohn on Jul 18, 2014 8:50pm
Fire the lot
Aprl 26th 2012 report states Arcan's NAV to be $7.28 fast forward to
June 23rd and Arcan's NAV now $0.63! Who's being held accounatable for the this - either someone fudged the 2012 numbers or perhaps someone is under estimating its current value? Why would there be such a huge disparity in the value unless perhaps there is/was some cooking of the books and numbers?
The Directors and Management are
unanimously recommending all parties accept Aspenleaf's offer - why?
Is there more bad news coming? Are they being rewarded after driving this
company into the ground and giving Aspenleaf a steal of a deal? Fire the lot! no bonuses, severance pay, cancel all share options and incentives, in fact have them pay back bonuses - especially for the over exaggeration of expectations of 6000 - 6500BOE in 2012, sad that many fell for it. Personally I don't think anyone could do worse - even a 5th grader lol! - my opinion of course! GLTA
Comment by
ThompsonRob007 on Jul 19, 2014 10:15am
The $'s above assume a much lower debt ratio for 100% Arcan. Their press release states $2.53 NAV at year-end 2013 and a $2.85/NAV in 2012 (P+P) with the debt included. Either way, Arcan's NAV did not catastrophically fall off the table in the past couple of months as alluded to by the previous Stckhouse poster.
Comment by
barneymillar on Jul 19, 2014 2:14pm
What would that accomplish? A company that no one wants to work at. Who runs that day to day operating aspects of the production. Breaking the management contracts means no one would work at Arcan without significantly greater compensation than these guys make. I understand the anger but that course of action is stupid.
Comment by
iroctsxv on Jul 20, 2014 9:21pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
iroctsxv on Jul 21, 2014 10:10am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
jd43xl on Jul 21, 2014 11:00pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
jd43xl on Jul 21, 2014 11:31pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
jd43xl on Jul 22, 2014 7:51am
The thing is, the common shares are probably worth less than what Aspenleaf offered. Legally, the debt has to be paid off before the common shareholders get anything, unless everyone agrees to this proposal where money gets taken from the debenture holders and given to the common shareholders. That is the issue.
Comment by
teevee on Jul 22, 2014 12:12pm
From that I infer you are willing to be paid in full with shares. Is that correct?
Comment by
jd43xl on Jul 22, 2014 9:18pm
It will never come to that. But I do understand the desperation of someone like yourself who holds the common shares, and is basically powerless.
Comment by
iroctsxv on Jul 24, 2014 11:37am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
ThompsonRob007 on Jul 24, 2014 1:08pm
IROCTSXV, Do you have proof that BarneyMillar is an insider at Arcan? I have read several of the posts and I don't see the connection to Arcan's management or Board. Trying to digest the filing today to determine which way to go with my small (but important to me) # of shares.