Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Arcan Resources Ltd ARNBF

OTCPK:ARNBF - Post Discussion

Arcan Resources Ltd > Info Circ
View:
Post by mathwhiz on Jul 25, 2014 2:48pm

Info Circ

There's definitely a bit of good news in the first few pages that I've had some time to go through. And a bit of bad as well. The bad stuff first... Never let Graeme Ryder choose the name for your new company. His obsession with bikes, cars and all things expensive, which is what he currently spends his days searching on Google, is partially the reason your shares currently hold no real value. Miura? Seriously? Okay then... Mark Smith leading the new company is a good thing. He at least has a brain in his head. Not sure where Penner is going, but jail wouldn't be a bad place for him. Andy is a smart man and has ethics, he just needs to voice them more often. Not a single director from the current Arcan board should hold any position in the new board, most of all Mr. McCoy! It would be interesting to get the breakdown on the RSU's as I am quite sure those didn't actually go to the employees but primarily to the folks with titles. We are giving a cash payment to a group of people as incentive for mis-managing our dollars? And we get what?? I bought back in at $0.78, $0.56, $0.46 and $0.24... Definitely not 'in the money' here... It's good to know that senior management didn't cancel their stock options for 'nominal' consideration, they made sure that the back end deal was cash in hand at a later date when it would be too late for anyone to dispute. They've had to pay employee retention? To whom? Management isn't going anywhere and the actual employees aren't getting a cent. That was a nice way to justify their 'cash in pocket' greedy guts attitude. Can't wait to read how much each of them walk away with. Back to my reading... Only another few hundred pages to go. Bad decisions is what got these guys here in the first place. Their initial offer for Hamburg was around $30 million. They were sure it was worth way more and so declined that offer. They went back begging a year later and sold it for $15 million?
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse