Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum AvenEx Energy Corp AVNDF

GREY:AVNDF - Post Discussion

AvenEx Energy Corp > Relative Share Contributions in Merger
View:
Post by pone on Apr 03, 2013 5:19pm

Relative Share Contributions in Merger

Originally, the three way merger was to have the following share distributions:

 

1 share of Avenex for 1 share of Spyglass

 

1 share of Pace for 1.3 shares of Spyglass

 

1 share of Charger for 0.18 shares of Spyglass

 

How have those numbers changed since the original proposed merger?

 

I see that today Pace had a 13 for 10 split?   Is this split the way of effecting the 1.3 for 1 Spyglass exchange, or is this split separate from and in addition to the Spyglass share transformation?

Comment by Joe454 on Apr 03, 2013 5:23pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by thomas35 on Apr 03, 2013 5:27pm
The share distributions remain the same. The only change was the reduction in dividend.
Comment by Kherson on Apr 03, 2013 11:32pm
 Thomas35, should I laugh or should I cry? Your only change has left a big hole in my pocket... Kherson
Comment by trismigistus on Apr 04, 2013 12:22am
Might I suggest Kearson that you take a tip from BLACKROCK, Inc who owns a 14% stake in Pace. They voted for this merger for a very good reason. Institutional Investors know full well that they stand a far greater chance of not only realizing a greater return by owning stock in a much larger company, but as well they stand to benefit from the far greater volume liquidity should they ever decide to ...more