Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Axios Mobile Assets Corp. AXBSF

GREY:AXBSF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by Splifka on Nov 27, 2015 4:29pm

Interest..?

Company has contracts, decent and growing revenue and is about to close on 18m and there is nothing doing on this forum?
Comment by valueseeker123 on Nov 28, 2015 11:31pm
Agreed, pretty pathetic! I guess it's a sign of how little the market cares about the small caps. I've done a ton of DD on this gem and believe it will be a highly disruptive player in a multi-billion business, so the stock price will eventually follow!
Comment by VPofFNE on Nov 29, 2015 5:58pm
What part of Axios do you think is disruptive? They're an alternative material pallet with no real abilities to collect them if shipped into an open loop. There is not one thing that they have that's disruptive.
Comment by Splifka on Dec 01, 2015 12:33pm
I respectfully disagree. Their pallats last three times longer, which makes them cheaper.  They can be sterilized, which allows them to be used for food sensitive products, i.e. eggs, which just so happen to be the contracts they have.  And egg farmers don't buy pallets, they lease them, so the loop is just that, closed.  Their pallats can be tracked, which given their carbon ...more  
Comment by VPofFNE on Dec 01, 2015 1:53pm
Splifka, I agree that their pallets are really good, but so are 100 other alternative material pallets out there. They can all be sterilized, they can all be electronically tracked, and they all have the same issue....there exists no method which can guarantee that these expensive pallets will be 100% returned when shipped into an open loop system. Pallets are not boomerangs, they need to be ...more  
Comment by valueseeker123 on Dec 01, 2015 10:55pm
The working model is closed loop, fully. They will have their own trucks. They already have commitments for well over 200,000 pallets. Each pallet cost about $75, and this will drop  Conservatively, they turn each one once per month at $6....Hmmm...that's enough gross revenue for the cost of the pallet that has a ten year life+ Sounds pretty good 
Comment by VPofFNE on Dec 08, 2015 1:37pm
Yup, they ALL - every single one of the alternative material pallet producers - have a closed loop target model. This is only a very very very small part of the pallet market, and everyone wants it. $6.00 per pallet trip is not reasonable nor is it sustainable. Try $4.25 - $4.50. After freight, handling, cleaning, storing and losses, this will provide a Gross Margin of ~50%. Then you have ...more  
Comment by Splifka on Dec 08, 2015 4:42pm
Cheers for that VPofFNE, Clearly you are an individual who knows with which he speaks.  You make a lot of good points, and I for one appreciate the insight. I whole heartedly agree with you in that there are a great many number of players, all with similar product offerings, although I hesitate to say if they are identical.  My DD has led me to conclude that the competition tends to ...more  
Comment by VPofFNE on Dec 08, 2015 9:23pm
Yes, I too have seen their financial projections...it's all over town. I do however have an advantaged viewpoint compared to most everyone else in the pallet pooling market. Axios is underestimating (in my opinion) some of their expenses when you overlay the real life of pallet pooling. They are projecting near perfect scenario, and in the world of the lowly pallet, this just doesn't exist ...more  
Comment by Splifka on Dec 08, 2015 10:38pm
Yes, I suspect your view of 50% gross margin is far more realistic than Axios' 70%.  You know what they say, 'if something can go wrong...'  Be that as it may... 50%. As far as Walmart, in my humble opinion they're the biggest you know what's, my point was rather the base with which to scale up is impressive. Yes, 8 years is a long time to be plugging away.  I ...more  
Comment by VPofFNE on Dec 09, 2015 9:02am
I'm not entirely sure that I understand the question. They landed customers, just like everyone else in the pallet industry does. They convinced some egg producers to use their pallets...there is nothing unusual about that. iGPS, despite their unbelievably poor track record, still has customers. Many other alternative material pallet producers have customers too. Don't misunderstand me ...more  
Comment by valueseeker123 on Dec 10, 2015 11:36pm
First off, my hat off to the two of you for the thoughtful back and for dialogue - very refreshing these days on the bullboards. Riddle me this...If Walmart tells its egg suppliers they need to use the Axios pallet, and the egg co needs to pay the $6, do you think the egg co will say F U?  of course not. OK, so to the point on Walmart ditching them for someone else, I have a couple answers ...more  
Comment by VPofFNE on Dec 12, 2015 12:37pm
I agree about the civilized dialogue. That doesn't happen often on these boards.  Again, don't confuse the fact that Wal-Mart 'accepts' the pallets, with Wal-Mart 'wanting' the pallets. Not only that, but there is no way that if there was $1.50/pallet on the table, Wal-Mart would want it, they wouldn't sacrifice profit for pallet type as they don't care which ...more