Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum BRALORNE GOLD MINES LTD BPMSF

GREY:BPMSF - Post Discussion

BRALORNE GOLD MINES LTD > Takeover by Avino
View:
Post by seagold on Jul 18, 2014 2:34pm

Takeover by Avino

This deal is made possible only after Avino bought Munday's 34% share in the company.  How they convinced him to sell is head scratcher.  They must have told Munday, it was worse off if he didnt sell.

The metrics of the deal are actually pretty terrible for BPM shareholders.  No Premium on the stock and one BPM for for 0.14 ASM share.  How can the board agree to a deal that excluded options to be excersized?  Usually in this case you would think the BOD would want to come out on top but I guess it tells you how knowledgeable they are about corporate transactions.

The fact that Avino now owns 34%, David Wolfin owns 0.8%, Bill Kocken owns 2.7%, and Gary Robertson owns 2.1%, makes up 39.6% of the outstanding shares.  They only need 10.4% to win.  There is no way Avino wins shareholder approval if they didn't have such a large position.  BPM's BOD should have tried to negotiate better terms.  Real let down to their shareholders.
Comment by MrLaw on Jul 23, 2014 11:29am
Seagold, I think they need less to win. They need 10.4% if 100% of the shares are voting, but if for instance only 75% is voting, then it already IS a done deal (39.6/75 is more than half). On the other hand, the buyout isnt entirely negative. I personaly prefer to be backed by a cash flow generating company instead of fully relying on 'test production'. So whilst you're right that ...more  
Comment by seagold on Jul 25, 2014 12:13pm
Thanks for the reply MrLaw. According to the law firm McCarthy: 66 2/3%. Special resolutions of a corporation’s shareholders require the approval of two thirdsof the votes cast under most Canadian corporate statutes (for corporationsincorporated under the British Columbia Company Act, 75% approval is required).Matters that require approval by special resolution include, for ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities