Comment by
zot on Dec 01, 2010 2:41pm
In my experience reverse splits are rarely the best for the small investor. When the Agm papers arrive in your mail one might be able to vote issues by phone in leu of attending. All shareholders should give this matter serious thought.
Comment by
EHV8TOR on Dec 02, 2010 12:45pm
I accidentally googled Balatron....with an r Not saying, just saying
Comment by
ilovebauxite on Dec 02, 2010 10:53pm
Don't give up yet. It ain't over. Voisey Bay flyover may find the missing link, with a k....
Comment by
ganzer on Dec 03, 2010 11:49am
What's wrong with a 3:1 split? New investors are going to shy away from 50 Million o/s? I don't think so.
Comment by
ilovebauxite on Dec 03, 2010 3:01pm
There are 125 million shares outstanding. 3-1 would reduce it to 41.6 million shares and about 6 million warrants. That's not bad. Especially if the flyover report shows promise. 4-1 would be 31.6 million shares and 5 million warrants. There certainly is room to wiggle.
Comment by
ganzer on Dec 07, 2010 12:40pm
I agree with you ILB ... 41.6 Million shares outstanding should satisfy the new crop of investors, reduce the sellingand put the Company on sounder footing for additional money raising. Why would the Board insist on giving existing shareholders a deeper haircut than that? Especially if Voisey and India show immediate promise.I don't get it ... The CEO should explain himself for this move.