Australis Capital Inc C.AUSA

vote with the yellow proxy

[mountainfresh]

The new board will be in control soon and hopefully will turn it around. They need to focus on cannabis, and according to their circular they will be. I’m not too sure on the capital-light strategy, that can have its problems, but given the current state of regulation in the US it’s probably the best way to go for now. Setting up an MSO through partnerships across the country and keeping the asset investment smaller upfront will be the safe strategy since they already have brands they acquired that they can promote. I voted with the yellow proxy!

[ssnakeyes]

The vote is only 2 weeks away… I hope everyone is voting yellow so we can get a new board in to start turning this company around. Excited for change!

[mountainfresh]

YES! AUSA needs a return to its cannabis roots. What initially built the company was the belief investors have in the cannabis market, and it’s a good belief as this market is one of the few still getting off the ground making it a perfect door to get your foot into since the room isn’t too crowded already. Dithering around with payment systems and vending machines isn’t going to get it inline for

[licari]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[oilcan2012]

Your right about the people.  You voted with yellow. Can you share who/why the people are in the Concerned Shareholders group that you feel will 'position the company as a leader?'  (Remember, I can always change my vote!) Can you also add some context as to why the Institutional Shareholder Services chose to recommend the Blue Proxy?   I willl look forward to your

[oilcan2012]

Perhaps you can further elaborate specifically 'who' is going to do this within the Concerned Shareholders group?

[oilcan2012]

Its regretful that Booth never thought out his strategy going into this.This never had to happen and now he will liklly be absorbing a huge fee to get something he is not going to get; control of AUSA.  You should not advocate for board members that have incentious linkages and questionable track records.  Those appointee's also have little experience/acumen in US business.&