Forte Group Holdings Inc C.FGH

Supreme court ruling jan 06 2022.

[moneymachine88]

This opens doors to Ceo's and companies being attacked and bashed with misleading defamatory posts, much like what you are doing Sleps to Bev and ceo. Someone filed a similar complaint and the judge ruled that stockhouse is to provide everything they have on the malicious person's like their email adress ,IP ADRESS, Phones like everything they have on these people hiding behind keyboards spreading the negative attacks, They are ordered, that means it's coming out! Now i'm pretty sure many officers directors and companies will be pursuing legal actions against bashers liars and defamatory statements. they have been waiting for this moment for a long time and since a judge in the supreme court already ruled for the plaintif I'm pretty sure they will have no poblem getting a rule against people like you and your buddies! Good luck sleps I think one day soon you will need alot of it!

[shneps]

I'm well aware of the Supreme court ruling and it has nothing to do with stating public information. I have only ever taken information related to the company's public record. The complaint was related to the person being referenced as Josef Mengele. (The "Angel of Death" in Nazi war camps) and that is not appropriate. I have stated my opinions are based on the information

[moneymachine88]

I didn't call you a liar because I felt like calling you a liar just for fun, I call you a liar because you are one..  You have spoken bad about the ceo and his family "company" for a very long time, you called them everything under the sun, Has anyone ever told you that you are not allowed to slander people on a public forum? All the stuff you also report with your own negative

[moneymachine88]

BTW! You say you don't lie? Your latest post about not being able to buy Keef products was a straight out lie! Then when I told you where you can get some close to you, you doubled down by using distributors being out of stock as if they would sell it to the public, wasn't that a blatant lie to attack the company? You think you're smart but when you get served with a lawsuit and I hope

[shneps]

Along with the internet I too retain all the documents related to the facts behind company statements. Even though (through their forward looking statements) the company has no requirement to retract in the future statements they have made in the news releases. They having knowingly misrepresented those facts in the first place. i.e.-  Approval by the ALR to expanded their facilities to 170

[moneymachine88]

I don't think you understand what you'd be up against if they come after you? personally you have no defence against defamatory attacks you've made against these people. In simple english you are not allowed to say half the things you said, weather you feel you are wright or wrong or you don't like them for what ever reason, you can't defame people by name on public forums

[moneymachine88]

The other thing is you post multiple times a day on different forums with alot of negative stuff about the company which is not true. it being a multi million dollar company I'm pretty sure a law suit if they were to file one would be in the multi million dollars. Face it sleps the odds are against you if that were to happen.

[shneps]

I may be posting negative stuff but that would be because this stock has gone from $1.47 to $0.19 that is an 87% share price drop. Also, in my opinion, the company has miss spent a significant amount of shareholders money over the years on loss leaders and investments in other companies. Is this not true? I didn't realize there was requirements for only speaking positively ftoward those facts.

[moneymachine88]

Slandering people directly and buisnesses without solid proof is against the law weather a company doubles in value or loses 100%. You are not protected because the company lost money in share value, it doesn't give you the right to slander or misinform share holders of what you believe is happening. Nobody appointed you to do so and for the stockprice going down it has alot to do with the

[shneps]

So you are stating somebody is filing a multi million dollar lawsuit against me. I just want to make sure this is fact and not just hearsay. Seeing as you are quoting the law.

[moneymachine88]

As I said i am stating what I heard that someone is looking into this, weather they file or not, how would I know? as for my guess if it's a multi million dollar company wouldn't they file a lawsuit that's in the millions if they feel your comments did damage to their company and investors '" directors"? But yes I did hear this, now if they go through with it or not beats

[shneps]

Ok. No problem. I just wanted to make sure you were merely "guessing" and through "hearsay" you are warning me. And this is ,as you say in your previous post it's "what you believe is happening". And "from what I'm understanding it will be a multi million dollar lawsuit if the judge rules on it." is what somebody personally called and told you? Just

[moneymachine88]

Not a guess! If I were you I'd run for the hills, your bashing and defamation and slander has been unreal.