Good Flour Corp C.GFCO

Some mixed signals

[throwaway11]

The company is sugesting itself as a "Beyond flour", which to me says they are trying to get as close as possible to wheat flour rather than to make an alternative with its own flavor/texture profile, like nutmilks vs cow milk.

This is a good aspiration to have, since many gluten-free flours do not have the same workability that allows it to be used in many pastries. So, I attempted to email the company to find out more about the properties of it.

Their server or some mail filtration system they are using rejected by email. I am using a widely used email provider.

I found the CEO's contact information and let him know directly that this was occuring. I never heard back from him.

I will have to buy their product or try it once and see for myself whether or not I really want to invest in this.

[throwaway11]

So most of a year on, come back to this stock to see a fair sudden uptick. ~$150k of shares sold by institutions so far.  Not sure if I would invest in this based on what I am reading in the contents of share capital in their latest statements. The panago news is very good but I think the downside is big at $23m and all the paper described there.

[throwaway11]

Very interesting to see how this stock has behaved so far. Seems to be almost no user activity on this forum and very few comments over 1 year period on Yahoo page. Not much retail fanfare.  Meanwhile, limited fanfare on Reddit with only one topic that is asking about the product itself and not just a post about the stock. Appears like nothing but stock bots mentioning it on Twitter. So

[StockShark]

Don`t bother buying it if you are not comfortable . It all depends on if all these new  sales deals bear fruit ? It`s very hard to pick up a decent position as it is very thinly traded .All I see is lot`s of good news and a stock with 70 million out standing shares and no one wants to sell ... or buy ( but you couldn`t even get 20k between here and 3.50 ) . I We have been trading a little

[throwaway11]

I just said I wouldn't. I'm posting this for others interest, not my own. My main point remains: even if they had $3,000,00 revenue per year -  they are now valued at $71.5m, and this trading activity seems to have been spurred by institutions or large buyers/sellers since there is next to no visible retail interest online anywhere. In that case ask yourself why an institution or

[throwaway11]

IMO my theory was probably accurate. Co. was asked by OTC markets to address promotional activity about itself. I have noticed that without explicitly searching for it on google, that my post (which I quote here) is not actually findable by browsing the bullboard directly. Not sure if this is a mere glitch or if stockhouse deliberately hid my concerns and doubts.