Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Molecule Holdings Inc C.MLCL

Alternate Symbol(s):  EVRRF

Molecule Holdings Inc. is a Canada-based licensed producer engaged in creating cannabis-infused beverages (CIBs) for the Canadian market. The Company operates through one segment being the production and co-packing CIBs. The Company produces drinks to provide opportunity and choice for people seeking a convenient and social way to consume cannabis. Its brands include PHRESH, embody, DULCES and... see more

CSE:MLCL - Post Discussion

View:
Post by dart321 on May 17, 2023 11:29am

Massive

this is out of this world, all my research says this company should be off the charts with sales. We know why it isn't it's the only reason the sales and share price of this company aren't going bonkers. It's the massive consultant fees two of the insiders have given themselves from day 1 of this company and destroying the companies working capital. If this had not happened sales would be off the charts and growing at a double to triple rate year over year. Think about it, if this didn't happen cash flow would have been massive and these two could have gave themselves huge wages at an ever increasing rate as the companies cash flow exploded but they didn't they took the cash out as soon as they could putting the company in a cash crunch. I wonder if their lawyers have look at the way they are doing it and then looked at the results of case law from people doing the same thing the same way?
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities