MountainWest Resources Inc. C.MWR

Court sets evidence points for 29407

[MTStack]

Santiago, October 14, 2020
 
Having seen:
 
The case is received for evidence and the following are set as relevant substantial facts and at issue:
 

1. The entity that made the publication, date, and content of it.
2. The relationship between the entity that made the publication and the defendant of the case.
3. The existence of the damages claimed. In the affirmative, the nature and amount of them.
4. The existence of moral damage.  In the affirmative, facts constituting the same.

 
The hearing is set for the last three days of the evidence period to receive testimony at 10:00 and if the last day is on Saturday, the next business day at the designated time.
 
Notification by certificate.

~
I think that CMN will ask for revision of the evidence points.  After refusing to rule on the jurisdiction question, not once but twice, even having been instructed by the Appeals Court, and stating that, instead, they would consider the Court's jurisdiction during the evidence phase of the trial, the 5th Civil Court neglected to include any opportunity for evidence on that very question.

[ugluuak]

Do you have the timing date on this Stacker? Is there in your thinking any likely posibility that Chile will accept jurisdiction in bringing to trial CMN over the fraud. Their point was that the damages came and were caused by Barrick in Canada in the PR released by Barrick. Nevertheless Barrick's position is based on CMN"s actions in setting up these disputed claims over a long period

[MTStack]

There is already an appeal by CMN against the 5th Civil Court because they failed to rule on the jurisdiction question after the Appeal Court found in CMN's favor that the question of jurisdiction should be taken under consideration. Since the 5th Court has already refused 2 times to rule, I have no idea what they are going to do, but the Appeal Court could go ahead and make the jurisdiction

[ugluuak]

This is a funny right like you are joking. Stacker writes "CMN's position on jurisdiction is that the press release was issued in Canada by a Canadian company, and CMN had no control over the issuance.  I also believe that CMN's position is that even if somehow they are found responsible for the press release, no damages were caused by it." CMN is an fully owned affiliate

[MTStack]

I expect you will now tell me that the real titles are in the basement of a pizza parlour in Santiago.