Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum MountainWest Resources Inc. C.MWR

CSE:MWR - Post Discussion

MountainWest Resources Inc. > C 29407-2016 re: alleged obstruction
View:
Post by MTStack on Oct 26, 2022 6:06am

C 29407-2016 re: alleged obstruction

As a reminder, JT alleged obstruction in the libel case against CMN, claiming that the witnesses, who did not appear for testimony, were duly notified and their non-appearance wasn't attributable to "this party".  He asked for a special evidentiary period to be opened for the witnesses to testify.

https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/c.mwr/mountainwest-resources-inc?postid=35030912

The Court determined:

To the presentation of the plaintiff dated October 17, 2022 in Folio 217:
In view of the provisions of Article 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is inadmissible for extemporaneousness.

~
I'm not quite sure what that exactly means, but his request for a special evidentiary period was denied.
Comment by MTStack on Oct 26, 2022 6:10am
extemporaneo can mean untimely, inopportune, or extemporaneousness,  take your pick
Comment by aurwar on Oct 26, 2022 12:48pm
The bar for proving libel is very high in Canada and the US. Probably similar in Chile, although I don't know for certain. One must show the intent was to do harm. It becomes exponentially more difficult to do that without witnesses. No witnesses...no one to question, no support for one's allegations...uh oh...I see C 29407-2016 headed to the heap of thrown out or lost cases by JRL/ JGT.  ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities