Post by
ugluuak on Mar 08, 2024 7:17pm
Perhaps an adjustment to the Pascua Lama History???
Phyllis Cybil Stacker Honey;
Is this history iron clad or will there be kinks in the armor plating.
Llanos is a _______, well a rat looks good in comparison ! almost edible !
Llanos could be that creepy looking individual at the back of the court room in that Perry Mason moment I alluded too in another post. Trouble is, he was/is not a willing witness.
2. Hector Unda Llanos acquired the Tesoro mining claims on the behalf of CMN, his employer, in February 1997 with the legal understanding that he would transfer these claims to CMN when they were fully constituted as exploitation mining concessions. These claims were also superimposed upon the Los Amarillos 1-3000 concessions and the Amarillo Sur and Norte in-process exploration claims.
3. On March 4, 1997, Villar signs the sales agreement completing the sale of Villar’s in-process claims to CMN. Subsequently, CMN lets these claims expire.
Comment by
MTStack on Mar 09, 2024 11:27am
So far, this suit looks like another attempt to sue on the basis of HUL's "dual testimony", which has been run up the flag pole in various other cases and failed to find any traction. I'll post some translations in a few days, but I wouldn't get excited about this trial producing any positive results for JL.
Comment by
ugluuak on Mar 09, 2024 12:11pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy