Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum MountainWest Resources Inc. C.MWR

CSE:MWR - Post Discussion

View:
Post by MTStack on Apr 06, 2024 9:14am

Finally

After almost a year in process, the exhorto in the libel case, C 29407-2016, has been returned.

JT requests:  I hereby ask this Court to digitize and upload the content of the international exhorto to the system, in view of the return of the exhorto by the Supreme Court ordered by resolution in the proceedings Rol No. 40672-2022.

And CMN requests: 

Fernanda Torres Mac-Pherson, attorney in representation of CMN, in the case about extracontractual responsibility named “Lopehandia Cortes v. Compania Minera Nevada SpA”, C 29407-2016, to this Court I respectfully state:
 
In view of the merits of the case, and in accordance with the provisions of Article 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure, I request that this Court summon the parties to hear the verdict.
 
In fact, the Official Document 52052-2024 of the Supreme Court, which on April 2, 2024, returned the international exhorto filed by the competent authorities of Canada, which was granted by this Court on December 13, 2022 (Folio 223), along with the extraordinary increase in the evidentiary period.  This as this Court is well aware, was intended by the opposing party for testimonial evidence from abroad, which was the only evidentiary measure pending in this case.
 
Thus, in view of the current state of the proceedings, in which the ordinary and extraordinary evidentiary periods have expired, and in which there is no evidentiary measure pending, it is appropriate, in accordance with Article 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that the parties be summoned to hear the judgement.
 
THEREFORE,
 
TO THIS COURT I respectfully request:  summon the parties to hear the verdict.
Comment by ugluuak on Apr 07, 2024 6:34pm
There will likely be more secret questions for this as well ? We will need to up the bribe ante .
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities