Post by
ugluuak on Jun 30, 2024 7:11pm
Did Barrick Lie ?
Cybil V. when you told the world in a presser that the ongoing litigations in Chile on certain properties referred to in the PASCUA LAMA project had no effect on the Barrick project.
These properites or claims were only to get road access to the mother load under the glaciers.
WAS THIS A LIE ?
Comment by
MTStack on Jun 30, 2024 8:08pm
No. Los Amarillos and the Tesoro concessions were not within the designated PL pit area. Unless Chile approved that area for mining, which it hadn't and hasn't to date, then it would be illegal to mine there. I don't know if they wanted to put a road through that area.
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 01, 2024 2:02pm
Do you have any opinions on the cancelation or rather the nullification of the original $20.00 sale by Villar to CMN as it would or could pertain to any other legal actions against CMN and Barrick. It would follow that JRL would still hold on to something not sure what, but there it is.
Comment by
MTStack on Jul 02, 2024 8:25am
How would you see that happening - the nullification of the original sale? I don't see a road for that to happen.
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 02, 2024 9:38pm
As we all know there was one ruling already where the $20.00 sale was declared unconstitutional. CMN sued the Judge with a baked story, paid off some legal peeps and the sale got recognised....... There is a road to the "no sale no more" but it is covered in Barrick/CMN excrement where it is not so easily identifiable. A couple more big rains required.
Comment by
ugluuak on Jul 03, 2024 10:49am
I think the worms in that can are still alive,not overly wriggly but alive nonetheless. Even a worm looses wrigglyness after a long dormant period. Some days even I loose some of my wriggles. This judge Kokisch (hope that is close) might still be looking in to these proceedings if she is still with us. "SUE me will they". We are all much longer in the tooth today and loosing daylight !